CaTGC

General => Silly and useless topics! => Topic started by: Bastard on 04.10.2014 00:38:23

Title: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 04.10.2014 00:38:23
When innocent, you can only shoot someone on truly valid grounds - analyse and act on facts. RDM will result in a slay/kick. Excessive RDM will result into a ban.

Okay, we all agree that this is a...let's say, "archaic" rule. Acting on facts and analysing stuff and actually deducing by using chains of logic is really boring and disrupts the flow of the game. We should definitely remove the rule since nobody follows it anyway and some older admins still punish people who break it. I'm not saying I am right and you HAVE to remove it, but I am just trying to convince the higher staff that it is a dumb rule for the following reasons:


(http://i.imgur.com/pIbnSFk.png?1)

"Ceterum censeo CaTGC esse delendam."    -Robert Downey Jr.



USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST.

Hihi ;3
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bush on 04.10.2014 01:04:16
You're a genius Watsuda.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 04.10.2014 01:08:31
Here is another graphical piece of evidence.

 :( (Boring non-RDMer) --> $$$
 ;) (Happy RDMer) --> $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

As you can see, the amount of donations got TRIPLED.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Stavik on 04.10.2014 02:05:59
+1  8)
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Naomie Smalls on 04.10.2014 02:07:33
Banned.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bush on 04.10.2014 02:27:34
Banned.
Cabose please demote blautsta
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 04.10.2014 02:48:29
http://www.bluestar.at/spots.asp
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Shy on 04.10.2014 03:21:39
#TrueStory
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 04.10.2014 04:06:42
#TrueStory

This made absolutely no sense. Go back to tumblr or whatever.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Shy on 04.10.2014 04:43:52
#TrueStory

This made absolutely no sense. Go back to tumblr or whatever.
#TrueStory that you are still mad, you should start grow up and stop cry Welcome to the real world Boy.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Dr. Deltality on 04.10.2014 10:30:50
Tell me you're joking.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: akiz on 04.10.2014 11:23:48
Tell me you're joking.
Tell me you're joking.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Dr. Deltality on 04.10.2014 12:36:58
I thought you were tired of the forum and the only reason you came back is because Blewie needed you to
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: The Guy on The Roof on 04.10.2014 12:47:25
Back to the topic shall we?
Watsuda, what about the people that get rdmed. We get new people to the server everyday and they will probably leave if they get rdmed
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Dr. Deltality on 04.10.2014 13:23:13
It's TTT, if RDM was allowed it would be deathmatch. That rule is what makes TTT what it is.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bang on 04.10.2014 13:53:46
Such rhetorical sarcasm!
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Naomie Smalls on 04.10.2014 14:31:12
The numbers don't lie, theres only one option left. Stop donations.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Shy on 04.10.2014 15:06:27
we need people to donate because everyone want the community to grow
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bang on 04.10.2014 15:29:41
What if we started a fire sale?
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 04.10.2014 15:59:58
Back to the topic shall we?

Thank you.

Watsuda, what about the people that get rdmed. We get new people to the server everyday and they will probably leave if they get rdmed

They know it's a necessary sacrifice. Whenever I get RDM'd, I feel like I have helped Bluestar keep the server alive. It's a good feeling. That's why Jan and I RDM each other a lot to blow off steam. It's a psychological thing called, uuuh, yeah well whatever it's a thing.

#TrueStory that you are still mad, you should start grow up and stop cry Welcome to the real world Boy.

My mother always used to say: "If you have nothing nice to say, then say nothing."
So how about you shut the fuck up, you annoying piece of shit. FUCK. Why don't you fucking grow up and learn how to go two sentences without insulting someone, huh, dumbass shit?

It's TTT, if RDM was allowed it would be deathmatch. That rule is what makes TTT what it is.

So what?! What TTT is right now is shit and boring. Only if we can transcend (whew that's a big word I don't even know how to use that) from those rules that chain us down, we can truly find euphory in the brilliant game that is Trouble in Terrorist Town.

What if we started a fire sale?

That is actually a pretty good idea. We could try that. We all sell our Pointshop items and give the points to Bluestar. He converts the points into real money (Which has to be possible: Donating real money gives people PS items, it has to work the other way around too!) which he can then use to fund more TTT servers for more RDMs. We need a second TTT server. I just realized that. I'll make a graph for that real quick.

(http://i.imgur.com/344PQ6W.png?1)

As you can see, the amount of dollar signs has TRIPLED from the first graph.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Explod1ngCake on 04.10.2014 17:41:18
Yea,i was just bored might as well remove it
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 04.10.2014 17:43:30
Good. I don't tolerate spam in my topic about economics.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bang on 04.10.2014 23:50:37
Holy shit let's do it
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 05.10.2014 13:26:20
Wow! You agreed to remove Rule 1 and got promoted to admin instantly! Here is a graph showing your success.

(http://i.imgur.com/GGiFHEt.png?1)
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bang on 05.10.2014 13:31:22
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 05.10.2014 14:25:16
I love what they did with this joke in the German dub!




It makes no sense!
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Ninjapirka on 05.10.2014 19:28:44
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 12.10.2014 17:16:46
What did he do?
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 24.02.2015 19:00:17
*sigh*

There have been no RDMs since mid-December. I told you donations would stop if RDMs stop, and guess what! They did!
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bang on 24.02.2015 19:11:18
Such a fucking genius Watsuda!
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Adolf Hipster on 25.02.2015 00:11:31
fucking old admins.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: DiivZe on 25.02.2015 07:20:09
fucking old admins.
The old admins where the best admins ;)
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Dr. Deltality on 25.02.2015 07:32:06
Better than the ones now, that's for sure.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Stavik on 25.02.2015 11:29:01
Better than the ones now, that's for sure.
Thanks
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Dr. Deltality on 25.02.2015 11:58:08
I said admins, not head admins, at least half of them.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Lalafell on 25.02.2015 13:10:30
I said admins, not head admins, at least half of them.
Butthurt agian?
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Dr. Deltality on 25.02.2015 13:57:49
Nah, I just hate you...agian
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Lalafell on 25.02.2015 15:10:23
Nah, I just hate you...agian
Geeze, you are a fun guy ^^
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 25.02.2015 16:01:23
If the admin rank were hidden and the server would just display that an admin is online, we'd probably get more people who actually want to do admin work instead of people who want to have a fancy color.

PS.: I thought only bitchy girls used the ^^ emoticon sarcastically.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: DiivZe on 25.02.2015 16:12:21
The problem is that some admins actually did their work and others didn't ...
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 25.02.2015 16:40:30
At least admins that do absolutely nothing are just...normal players with colored names. The real problem is abusers, which we don't have. (I think.)

Although there was that one time everybody was demoted because some guy who never plays on the server and doesn't really know anyone threw a childish fit.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Naomie Smalls on 25.02.2015 17:27:04
I don't understand what server you're talking about. Do we have a server?
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Nieksas on 25.02.2015 18:01:02
stoopid  ???
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 25.02.2015 19:45:37
I don't understand what server you're talking about. Do we have a server?

Lack of server ---> No RDMs ---> No donations ---> Lack of server

Obviously, this is a stable time loop. Pretty basic stuff.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Jack Smoses on 25.02.2015 21:46:09
Remember its silly and useless
emm what i wanted to write here now?
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Lurifax on 26.02.2015 09:51:30
yah see, lil uns; when I was admin, the world was a better place.
lots of money everywhere and admins fucked around as the pleased. Good times.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Dragzorath on 26.02.2015 11:40:15
At least admins that do absolutely nothing are just...normal players with colored names. The real problem is abusers, which we don't have. (I think.)

Although there was that one time everybody was demoted because some guy who never plays on the server and doesn't really know anyone threw a childish fit.

Idk dude, from what I remember, only the inactive head admins (who had already been previously talked with), Noomie, and Owen were demoted. Latter two temporarily because they were involved with some overly sarcastic and edgy guy. Which wouldn't even been a big deal if an ex-admin wouldn't had overstepped his boundaries and made it seem as if someone was just causing chaos.

That wasn't probably the best move, just disabling two admins like that, even though temporarily. Nor was conjuring nine layers of sarcasm and patronizing the guy trying to get context on the situation to decide if there is a need to do anything at all.

But hey, on the bright side, at least you can accept you were wrong to trivialize the situation, not like you carry some sort of personal vendetta for that person and attempt to preach his incompetence.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Naomie Smalls on 26.02.2015 16:47:01
Idk dude, from what I remember, only the inactive head admins (who had already been previously talked with), Noomie, and Owen were demoted. Latter two temporarily because they were involved with some overly sarcastic and edgy guy. Which wouldn't even been a big deal if an ex-admin wouldn't had overstepped his boundaries and made it seem as if someone was just causing chaos.

That wasn't probably the best move, just disabling two admins like that, even though temporarily. Nor was conjuring nine layers of sarcasm and patronizing the guy trying to get context on the situation to decide if there is a need to do anything at all.

But hey, on the bright side, at least you can accept you were wrong to trivialize the situation, not like you carry some sort of personal vendetta for that person and attempt to preach his incompetence.

stop saying 'that person' like a puss-puss and say names fgt

 :-*
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: DiivZe on 26.02.2015 17:12:45
Names aren't necessary at all;)
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 26.02.2015 18:06:22
But hey, on the bright side, at least you can accept you were wrong to trivialize the situation, not like you carry some sort of personal vendetta for that person and attempt to preach his incompetence.

I'm just still salty about it and haven't gotten it out of my system yet!

Who made what seem as if who was causing chaos? What chaos? The initial argument that happened on the server or the shitstorm that followed after the demotions? You make it seem like there was an evil puppetmaster at work even though it was just two fellas yelling about RDM on the server and the guy who was blamed for it denying it.

Why aren't names necessary? Are you subtly talking to the person you mean without saying their name? Am I that person? Because the message is really not getting through to me so I think you are either misinterpreting or remembering something wrong, or that I'm just remembering something wrong.

(This post has no irony in it and all the questions I asked were honest! We still haven't talked about it because I honestly didn't think it even deserve to be taken seriously, but now I'm really curious and I wanna clear this up.)

EDIT: Seriously guys, am I that person

                       help
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Naomie Smalls on 26.02.2015 18:17:06
Names aren't necessary at all;)

Well since I have no clue who exactly he means with 'that person' I'd like names.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Dragzorath on 26.02.2015 20:46:07
Since some people seem to be suffering from memory loss and some others from extreme sarcasm, I might as well summarize and clarify it once more so everybody can get over it.

Old thread:
http://catgc.com/index.php?topic=647.msg6103

To start off, Watsuda was right about one thing. I barely know anybody here so I treat everyone alike until they can prove their competence. In addition I was and still am skeptical about most of the current staff's competence just because of the fact I have this position.

Islu and Destructive complain to me about Noomie, Owen and Watsuda abusing the powers of the former two on them.

Although they provided proof it was way too out of context to be called that.

I message Noomie, Owen directly, asking them what happened.

Noomie and Owen tell me Islu and Destructive were trolling.

Watsuda adds me and describes the situation with exaggerated metaphors.

At this point it was pretty clear it wasn't anything serious so I invite Islu, Destructive, Noomie, Owen, and Watsuda into a group chat to ask them to stop messing with eachother.

(This is where it would had stopped, because I didn't see any proof from either side to push the blame just on one side)

Watsuda again speaks in exaggerated metaphors, then leaves the group chat and deletes me.

After that everyone else seemingly dismiss me as well and leave the chat.

Since it didn't seem like the point got across, I proceeded to demote everyone involved (Noomie, Owen) temporarily, and at the same time remove the inactive head staff (whom I had spoken with a few days-weeks earlier regarding their activity) from the roster.

Owen messaged me soon after and I assured him it was temporary and I'd revert it the next day.

The next day I find out someone had told Diivze I demoted a bunch of people for no reason and he had restored everyones' ranks.

And that is pretty much it. Was it unreasonable to demote people suddenly without any notice? Maybe. Was it unreasonable to expect people to cooperate with someone investigating a complaint?
I don't think I'm asking for a lot here, I like to think I'm a fair person, what I was expecting was everyone involved acknowledging they won't cause some sort of drama again and involve me without proof. I don't get any answers and get patronized.
Perhaps it's not the best comparison, but if you're a cop called to a pub about two fighting parties but can't figure out who's at fault, you're going to haul them all off to figure it out, I figured I'd let it slide since nothing really happened, but then one of the people decided to not cooperate and just leave. Now my sole purpose here is to solve problems like that, if people don't want to cooperate I'm not left with many choices.
Maybe I'm taking things too seriously, but if you think I'm so terribly irrational and incompetent that you're surprised I am even in this position in the first place, you can create some sort of community poll and vote me off, and I promise I'll never use any privilege higher than an average user's again for the common good.

I do hope you'll be able to get it out of your system at some point Watsuda, maybe even lose a few layers of sarcasm.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 26.02.2015 22:02:03
Nobody here is suffering memory loss or being sarcastic. I sure wasn't being sarcastic when I asked all those questions! I asked what the hell you meant because the things you described just outright don't apply to me. You were just being cryptic and using metaphors about "layers of sarcasm" and being "edgy" and whatever instead of speaking about actual things I did anyway. It almost seems like out of all the people "involved", being me, Noomie, Owen, Destructive, Islu and you, you are the only one who doesn't actually know what happened.

I sort of understand what you did and why you did it, but the problem is that I didn't even know that I was involved. I know what sparked the whole thing was an "RDM" I made, but whatever Islu and Destructive were complaining about both on the server and to you was its own thing. I think they mainly complained about power abuse and whatnot.

Here's a quick rundown: I see Islu (or Destructive) shoot an innocent guy. I shoot the killer. The killer was also innocent and told me that it was RDM since I should have known that he shot him in self-defense, which I didn't because I just came in the room. (Something like that, I may be remembering that wrong.)
Anyway, since my answer to his report was plausible enough and nobody had proof I RDM'd (innocent until proven guilty etc.), which I still think I didn't, I didn't get slain.

I did tell the admins (Noomie or Owen or whoever it was) to slay me after Destructive complaining for like 10 minutes, but that didn't stop him.

I see that one tiny pseudo-RDM and whatever they complained about to you as two seperate problems. I never really had the impression that I even had anything to do with whatever they told you. Since I didn't wanna be involved in yet another TTT-server-admin-corruption-drama (which is why I left admin in the first place), I decided to overcompensate for that by not taking ANYTHING related to it seriously and at the same time ridiculing the entire situation. (I still think it's ridiculous, but how I went about it was obviously stupid and I'm sorry for that.)

The actual shitstorm (that was just an incident in the middle of the night that passed as quickly as it it happened and didn't even have that many witnesses) that followed was just a mix of an arguably weird decision and poor communication. I'm saying "arguably weird" because I can see why you demoted everyone, but at the same time I would have never thought of doing something even remotely like what you did. (Probably because I've known all of them for a while.)


The part about the poor communication is the interesting one.


So apart from the fact that I never fucking told you anything about what happened from my point of view until this very moment, you also didn't really get your intentions across very well.

From my point of view, you just seemed like an insane dictator who didn't even deserve his power (a "tyrannus absque titulo", if I remember the book I read like an hour ago correctly. Teehee!) and completely misplaced his anger. It didn't seem like


"There is a conflict and I want to solve it, but fucking Watsuda isn't taking it seriously and since I can't solve it in a traditional way, I'll have to get the message across another way",

it seemed more like

"Those two random guys I don't even know told me that two other admins I don't even know are biased and I am going to instantly believe them. Additionally, some other random guy who is just a player on the server who has nothing to do with the problem at hand doesn't take the problem seriously so I am just going to demote the two allegedly biased admins for 'being involved with an edgy guy' and also some other admins who weren't even there because why the fuck not".


Now you could say:
"But...Watsuda, if you didn't think I didn't communicate well enough with you, then why did you just delete me from friends and refuse to take anything I say seriously? And why do you get your anger out of your system by writing sarcastic references about toe stubbing like a child instead of actually talking about it like you are doing right now?!"
To which I'd say:
"Shit, good point."  :'(

I'm gonna explain a bit further why I didn't take you or the situation seriously. Let's say the shitstorm came in two waves.

Wave 1: The RDM on the server.

The initial reason I didn't take the situation seriously is that I didn't even know I was involved in a situation. There was an RDM thingie but that got solved. Since the way it lead to a discussion about biased staff and corruption was so indirect and had nothing to do with me, even though I caused it (just like my grandma giving birth to my mother would be a "cause" of me stabbing a homeless guy), I didn't feel like taking it seriously or partaking in any discussion about it since I was punished for it anyway. (Compare it to a suspect to a case paying a fee so he won't have to go to court and then getting schlepped to court anyway. He'd be pissed!)

Wave 2: The whole demotion thing and the discussion on the forums.

As soon as I saw that you blamed me for it in any way (I still thought I had nothing to do with the situation, mind you) I just couldn't take it seriously at all! This is the moment where I got the impression I described colored in red above.

Not only that, it made me feel really uneasy. I never really had a problem with the server's higher admins, and then you came along and acted impulsive enough to just demote people I'd consider friends and blaming me for it. Again, poor communication on both ends. Still, I see that you and I agree on the fact that demoting everyone was a very questionable way to go about it. Quite extreme.

Here's a funny little thing only three people know:

I laughed about it with Islu and Destructive right after it happened on Teamspeak because I realized that they didn't take the situation seriously either. They told me that they legitimately didn't like the higher staff of the server and used the "RDM" I caused as a reason to complain to you and cause some drama before leaving the server forever. The drama that unfolded was more dramatic that they had ever expected, which made it even funnier.
Now this is just me saying that and I wouldn't mind if you thought I lied, but I don't wanna keep my mouth shut about it anyway. Making it seem like someone was just causing chaos, yeah right. If you don't believe me, why believe them? You randomly trusted them and demoted two people and now you say the reason for that is "being involved with an edgy guy"?! So them talking to me, the guy having nothing to do with the situation that you decided to hate, is a reason to demote them on a whim because some guys are saying they are biased?


As a little PS at the end of the humble little text I just wrote: That Old thread link doesn't work. I don't know what it's supposed to be linking to (I guess the thread you made one day later?) but as far as I know, that thread was gone a day after it was made. I thought it was deleted until now. I guess it's only visible to you? Try logging out and clicking it.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Dragzorath on 26.02.2015 22:33:33
I was being vague since I assumed we both had the same understanding of the situation and thus I was right, since you never seriously tried to dispute me, even after I pretty much put the blame on you.

But it as it seems I was wrong, now that I've read your side of the story, I apologize for putting the blame on you, I'd delete my original response, but like you said, I'm an idiot and didn't realize the thread had been moved to the admin section. Even though I'd probably still do the same since there wasn't really any other way to interpret the situation since you just left.

I didn't think people would make such a big deal out of it for the same reasons, that the people involved were aware of what had happened and accepted it, especially since all those demoted would be back with their rank in like 10 hours and like said, most of the head staff should had known their ranks were being removed since they had already been legacy for a while.

So that's pretty much it, you explained it very well with miscommunication being the biggest culprit, hopefully next time we can talk things through before leaving or making rash decisions, I already told Noomie and other higher staff after that fiasco, that I'll just assume the staff is in the right the next time, and not get involved at all unless there's definite proof.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 26.02.2015 22:41:56
Yeah, both sides were kinda stupid and by communicating poorly they made themselves seem even more stupid.

Now that this is cleared up, I hope we'll all learn from it and avoid making the same mistakes in the future.

Although there needs to be a server in the first place for us to avoid making the mistakes on.  :(
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Naomie Smalls on 26.02.2015 23:57:58
i am a watson

:3
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Islu on 27.02.2015 00:39:24
Wait, why is this shitfest being disscussed again? This was several months ago.

Beating a dead horse is getting old
(http://i.imgur.com/IwK5sDa.gif)                             
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 27.02.2015 00:44:27
It's was "discussed" for the first time ever and solved already. You're a bit late with that dank gif.


ps go back to redidt
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Stavik on 27.02.2015 01:23:12
This just brings back bad memories. Also, why are you still here Islu, I thought you said you wouldn't return after you got demoted.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Lurifax on 27.02.2015 17:04:08
This topic surely is in the right place
Silly and useless
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 27.02.2015 17:50:51
WOW THANK YOU FOR PROCLAIMING THAT


HERE ARE SOME OTHERS WHERE YOU CAN POST THAT
http://catgc.com/index.php?board=65.0


Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Islu on 27.02.2015 19:02:40
This just brings back bad memories. Also, why are you still here Islu, I thought you said you wouldn't return after you got demoted.

You wot, m8? I left. I got demoted for "inactivity" and the reason for being inactive was that I couldn't be arsed to play Gmod.

For the record, I stopped playing Gmod and haven't played it since.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Dessi on 27.02.2015 19:19:28
This has been dead for ages and since Watsuda doesn't understand how to get right on point and always have to draw it out with vague and unnecessary comments this just seems more stupid.

Only reason why you would want to discuss this again is because you have some petty grudge against one another, which is stupid or you just didn't get it the first time. If you really dislike someone and can't move on like a normal person just take it in private, you gain absolutely nothing from discussing this public, no one cares about this anymore.

Also modesty Watsuda, stop using sarcasm so much, even though you seem to think you don't it makes you look like a bit of a twat.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 27.02.2015 22:12:30
Dude, the discussion was over before you or Islu came in here. All you are doing is bringing it up again and again while complaining about it getting brought up all the time. You also managed to complain about nobody caring while proving that you care to some degree by writing your post? I could write a thesis about how absolutely pointless your post is. The discussion is literally over forever after being seriously discussed for the first time ever and you're a bit late to the party to complain about it. Nobody wants to discuss it again. It ended on a nice and light hearted note and then three people decided to not read it and then complain about it being discussed again, while starting a discussion about discussing it again, even though nobody wants to discuss it again or discuss discussing it again. Now stop the discussion and the meta-discussion and get back to the real problem:

What you should be complaining about is the fact that we are lacking RDMs and therefore donations.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Naomie Smalls on 27.02.2015 23:24:08
(http://media.giphy.com/media/UfXWkLHDE3mg/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 27.02.2015 23:25:56
Why is he so fast
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Jack Smoses on 27.02.2015 23:26:41
Why is he so fast
hungry
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Naomie Smalls on 27.02.2015 23:28:35
I love it so much
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Dessi on 27.02.2015 23:58:27
This community never ceases to amaze me with the amount of people that are on the spectrum.
Title: Re: [Suggestion] Removing Rule 1
Post by: Bastard on 28.02.2015 01:45:03
DAE autism? top kek thanks doc inb4 implying

Stay on topic though. This is a thread about economics, not autistic people. It should have also ceased to amaze you months ago. Come on, man!
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal